Skip to content
Your Name
Menu

Projects

active ยท 2025

Atlas Dashboard

A personal analytics dashboard for tracking reading, writing, and project progress over time.

Year
2025
Status
active
Role
Sole developer
  • Astro
  • TypeScript
  • SQLite
  • Tailwind CSS

Overview

Atlas is a placeholder case study for a private analytics dashboard. Replace this content with the real problem, approach, and outcome for one of your flagship projects.

Problem

Important work was scattered across notes, calendars, and repositories. There was no single place to answer simple questions: what shipped this month, what stalled, and where attention should go next.

Goals

  • Collect lightweight signals without becoming another heavy productivity system
  • Keep the interface calm enough for daily use
  • Prefer local-first storage and boring, reliable technology

Architecture

The app is statically generated where possible, with a thin data layer for local records. Charts and summaries are derived from structured events rather than free-form notes.

Key decisions:

  1. Static shell โ€” fast loads and simple hosting
  2. Typed event model โ€” reading, writing, and shipping events share a common schema
  3. Minimal UI โ€” lists and small charts instead of dashboards full of widgets

Challenges

The hardest part was deciding what not to track. Early versions collected too many metrics and made the product feel noisy. Reducing the event vocabulary improved both the data model and the interface.

Implementation

Daily entries are written as structured records, then aggregated into weekly and monthly views. The reading experience favors scanability: dates in monospace, titles as plain links, and quiet separators.

Outcome

This placeholder describes the intended result: a calm weekly review habit and clearer project prioritization. Replace with measured outcomes when available.

Lessons learned

  • Constraint beats feature completeness for personal tools
  • Metadata should earn its place on the page
  • Case studies are more useful when they explain tradeoffs, not just tech stacks

Comments

Signed in with GitHub. Discussion is stored as a GitHub issue.